Page 24 - November 2022 - Truth & Tidings
P. 24

e’ve looked at two texts now   for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus
                 in which Jesus is called Lord   Christ, through whom are all things and
        Win a way that identifies Him as      through whom we exist.”
        Yahweh.  We all know there’s only one   In two parallel lines, this verse identifies
               1
        Yahweh. So if the Bible identifies not only   the one God as the Father, and the one
        the Father as Yahweh, but also the Son and   Lord as Jesus Christ. Anti-trinitarians take
        Spirit, this would prove that the triunity   the first line in an exclusive way. When
        doctrine is scriptural: one God in three   Paul names the one God as the Father,
        distinct Persons.                     he’s firmly excluding the Son, they say.
          What anti-trinitarians need, then, is a   The Father is the one God; the Son is not.
        text that reduces the significance of Jesus’   But to be consistent, they must also do
        being called Lord, and they have it, they   the same with the second part of the verse:
        think, in 1 Corinthians 8:6. After stating   the Son is the one Lord; the Father is not.
        that there is only one God (v4), Paul goes   The problem is that the NT elsewhere
        on to identify this one God as the Father:   affirms that the Father is Lord,  and that
                                                                        3
        “For us there is one God, the Father” (v6).    Jesus is God. 4
                                          2
        Paul does not say that the one God is the   So push the problem back across the
        Son, nor that He is Father, Son and Spirit.   table. If anti-trinitarians insist from this
        No, the one God is the Father. How can   text that the Father is the one God to the
        you get a triune God out of that?     exclusion of the Son, they must also insist
          As if  that wasn’t damaging  enough   that the Son is the one Lord to the exclu-
        to  the  triunity  doctrine,  Paul  goes  on   sion of the Father. “True, the Son is Lord,”
        to say that there is one Lord, the Lord   they’ll acknowledge, “but the Father is
        Jesus Christ (v6b). To some this implies   Lord of all.” But then why shouldn’t a
        that “Lord” isn’t such a significant name   trinitarian do the same with the first part
        or title for Christ after all. It must mean   of the verse (“True, the Father is God, but
        something less than “God,” and thus it   so is the Son”)? Also, if the Son is Lord and
        cannot mean that Jesus is Yahweh.     the Father is Lord, what are we to do with
          But once again, a text often cited to   the statement that there is only one Lord?
        disprove the Trinity strengthens the case   Doesn’t one plus one equal two?
        for the Trinity when we look carefully at   Shema the Shema
        what it has to say about Christ.        Deuteronomy 6:4 was the Jews’ John
        Shift the Problem                     3:16. They knew it backwards and for-
          In fact, the real problem is for those   wards, reciting it daily. It is called the
        who deny the triunity of God. Here’s the   Shema (“Hear”) after the first word in the
        verse in full: “Yet for us there is one God,   verse: “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God,
        the Father, from whom are all things and   the LORD is one.” Our second response
        ¹ Rom 10:13; Php 2:5-11               ³ Act 17:24; 1Ti 6:15; Mat 11:25; Rev 4:11
        ² Scripture quotations in this article are from the   ⁴ Joh 1:1,18; 20:28; Rom 9:5; Titus 2:13; Heb 1:8;
        ESV.                                  2Pe 1:1

        344 TRUTH kTidings   November  2022
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29